The Tribune – Harpreet Murder Case; Next hearing fixed for November 11

Tribune News Service

Patiala, November 4. As the hearing in the infamous murder case of Harpreet Kaur, daughter of former SGPC president Bibi Jagir Kaur, resumed in the court of Special Judge (CBI Cases), Patiala, Balbir Singh, here today, Satnam Singh Kler, counsel for the main accused in the case (Bibi Jagir Kaur), moved an application in the court, urging that he wanted to put questions, pertaining to the case, before the five witnesses in the case.

Talking to The Tribune, Kler said, “In order to ensure that no one can influence the witness, I can not disclose the name of the witnesses to whom I intend to put questions. I have submitted my application before the court and the next date of hearing in the case has been fixed for November 11.”

During today’s court proceedings, the main accused Bibi Jagir Kaur and co-accused Sanjeev Kumar, Paramjit Singh Raipur, Harminder Singh and Satya were present, whereas Dalwinder Kaur Dhesi and Nishan Singh had got exemption from personal hearing.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20111105/punjab.htm#15

The Tribune – Khalra case: Supreme Court upholds life sentence to six policemen

R Sedhuraman, Legal Correspondent

New Delhi, November 4. The Supreme Court today upheld the life sentence awarded to six Punjab policemen for abducting and murdering human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra in September 1995 for exposing police misdeeds. The convicted policemen are DSP Jaspal Singh, ASI Amarjit Singh, Head Constable Prithipal Singh, Jhabal SHO Satnam Singh and SIs Surinderpal Singh and Jasbir Singh.

A Bench comprising Justices P Sathasivam and BS Chauhan provided as many as 24 reasons for confirming the life term despite the fact that the body of Khalra could not be recovered. In the 58-page verdict, the Bench pointed out that eyewitnesses had confirmed that Khalra had been abducted and detained.

“Tolerance of police atrocities, as in this case, would amount to acceptance of systematic subversion and erosion of the rule of the law ,” the SC ruled while accepting the contention of Additional Solicitor-General Mohan Jain that any relief to the accused would shake the faith of the common man in the law enforcing machinery.

Endorsing the October 16, 2007, verdict of the Punjab and Haryana High Court enhancing to life imprisonment the seven-year term awarded to Prithipal, Satnam, Surinderpal and Jasbir, the SC Bench said the HC could not have remained “a silent spectator where stinking facts warrant interference in order to serve the interest of justice.”

The SC noted that Khalra had informed a large number of people that he was facing a threat to his life. Further, Khalra was able to generate public pressure against the police authorities which angered the police.

The Punjab Police did not pursue the complaint filed by the victim’s wife Paramjit Kaur. It also did not cooperate with the CBI which subsequently investigated the case. “The police officials of Punjab united in an unholy alliance as their colleagues were involved and the case was sure to tarnish the image of Punjab Police,” the apex court noted.

The accused policemen attempted to prevent the testimony of the witnesses by threatening, harassing and implicating them in false criminal cases, it observed.

“We do not find any reason to interfere with the well-reasoned judgment and order of the HC. The facts of the case do not warrant review of the findings recorded by the courts below. The appeals lack merit and are accordingly dismissed.”

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20111105/punjab.htm#14

Published in: on November 5, 2011 at 7:53 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

The Asian Age – Pakistan to send judicial commission soon

Asian Age Correspondent

New Delhi, 5 November 2011. Pakistan has informed India that it will soon send a judicial commission to record the statements of key persons linked to the probe into the Mumbai terror attacks.

Throwing the ball in India’s court, Pakistan, however, has sought “certain details’’ relating to the case.

Pakistan high commissioner to India Shahid Malik, who met home minister P. Chidambaram on Friday, conveyed to him that the government of Pakistan will be sending the judicial commission soon to carry forward the process of bringing the conspirators of the 26/11 attack to justice.

“The government of India has been informed. The home minister has been informed by me that we will be sending a commission. Now it is for the Indian government to give us certain details,” he said without elaborating. Mr Malik also said dates of the proposed visit were yet to be finalised and conveyed to the Indian government.

For India, the proposed visit of the judicial commission is important to prove in the Pakistani court that the terrorists who stormed Mumbai on 26/11 were Pakistanis and the conspiracy of the deadliest terror attack was hatched on Pakistani soil.

When asked how soon the Commission will visit India, the Pakistan envoy said, “I cannot put a date to it. Now the process has started. So, I am sure it will take place soon.

At the moment, I have come to inform the home minister that we have decided to send a Commission”.

The visit of the judicial commission from Pakistan has been delayed by several months with both countries first discussing the proposed visit in March 2011 during the home secretary-level talks where it was indicated by the Indian government that it would be ready to receive the commission as early as May.

http://www.asianage.com/india/pak-send-judicial-commission-soon-316

The Netherlands : Den Haag – Rotterdam – Amsterdam 2 till 12 September 2011

Mostly pictures of gurdwaras, trains and trams taken during my recent visit to the Netherlands

9 September, Station Zuid WTC and Schiphol Airport

Station Zuid WTC, GVB Metro line 50

Station Zuid WTC, GVB Metro line 51

Station Schiphol Airport, train from Zuid WTC

Station Schiphol Airport, waiting for the Brussel Intercity to take me to Den Haag

Belgium and Netherlands public transport pictures at :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/12445197@N05/sets/72157622685920411/ 

More Netherlands pictures to follow
Harjinder Singh
Man in Blue

The Tribune – Legislators’ Criminal Background; Supreme Court notice to Centre, states on PIL

R Sedhuraman, Legal Correspondent

New Delhi, November 4. Expressing concern over the criminal background of a large number of MPs and MLAs, the Supreme Court today issued a notice to the Centre and all the state governments, seeking their response to a PIL that seeks completion of trial of such elected representatives within six months.

During a brief hearing, a Bench comprising Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Chelameswar described as “very disturbing” the petitioners’ claim that as many as 163 of the 545 MPs of the present Lok Sabha were facing criminal cases.

Directing the governments to file their response within four weeks, the Bench also wanted to know as to why the Fast Track Courts (FTCs) were not giving priority to such cases.

Senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the petitioners, said an annual allocation of Rs 75 crore had been made for FTCs, but still, they were not functional in several states.

The PIL has been filed jointly by former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) JM Lyngdoh, former DGPs BR Lall (Haryana) and Julio F Ribeiro (Punjab), ex-Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy and seven others who have come together under the India Rejuvenation Initiative, a social forum, to stem the deterioration in moral and ethical values in public life.

The forum was instrumental in removal of PJ Thomas as the CVC and filing of a case against those responsible for alleged payment of bribe to MPs for supporting the July 2008 confidence vote in the Lok Sabha.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20111105/main8.htm

Published in: on November 5, 2011 at 7:28 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

Dawn – Civilians, military consulted on India trade

By Baqir Sajjad Syed and Nasir Jamal

5 November 2011

Islamabad/Lahore: Key civilian and military functionaries met on Friday to discuss the process of easing trade with India in the run-up to grant it the MFN (most favoured nation) status.

“As part of regular consultations, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar today consulted all stakeholders on foreign policy issues, including the resumed dialogue process with India, at the Foreign Ministry,” said a cautiously-worded press statement issued by the FO spokesperson’s office.

There was no mention of which ‘stakeholders’ attended the meeting presided over by the foreign minister. But according to a source, the meeting was attended by officials from the military, intelligence, ministries of interior, commerce and defence and the Foreign Office.

The meeting was meant to discuss progress in the resumed dialogue with India in view of Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s expected interaction with his Indian counterpart Dr Manmohan Singh on the sidelines of Saarc summit in Maldives next week. The consultative session at the Foreign Office also served as the preparatory meeting for the next round of resumed dialogue likely to commence later this month.

Reuters quoted an unnamed Indian government official as having said: “From the initial announcement of an unconditional grant of an MFN, there appears to be a clear backtrack.”

Delhi’s assessment was immediately dismissed by the Foreign Office whose spokesperson Tehmina Janjua said: “Pakistan is not backtracking.”

Notwithstanding Ms Janjua’s media assertion, a participant of the meeting, while sharing the essence of the discussion during a private conversation, projected MFN to be slow-tracked for now because of strong reaction.

Apart from the MFN issue, he said, there was a broad agreement on continuing engagements with India.

Meanwhile, talking to a group of journalists in Lahore, Prime Minister Gilani clarified that his government had not “given” the MFN status to India. “The cabinet has only given its approval in principle to move forward on the issue and permitted the ministry of commerce, which is actively engaged in trade talks with New Delhi, to negotiate with it trade-related issues.”

Mr Gilani said he would brief parliament on the MFN status at an appropriate time, adding that cabinet approval was necessary to move forward on the issue.

He was of the opinion that liberalisation of trade with India would benefit Pakistan’s economy. “It does not mean that we have given up our stand on other issues, including Kashmir. Look at the rising trade volume between China and India despite their border disputes.”

The prime minister said he had persuaded his Indian counterpart to resume the composite dialogue (on all outstanding issues and disputes, including Kashmir) stalled after the Mumbai attacks in Nov 2008. “I told Dr Manmohan at our meetings in Sharm el-Sheikh, Thimphu and Mohali that terrorists were common enemies of both countries and we should not let one incident hold the whole peace process as hostage.”

Agencies add: In France, the Indian prime minister has welcomed Pakistan’s decision to grant the MFN status to India, but said it should have been done long ago, according to the Economic Times newspaper.

”Better late than never. I welcome it,” Dr Manmohan told reporters in the French coastal resort of Cannes on Friday.

“As one who believes that, rightly or wrongly, the destinies of countries in South Asia are very closely linked. I welcome the decision of Pakistan to grant us the MFN treatment.”

However, he said he felt this decision should have come long ago. ”I think it is nearly 17 years ago when India gave the most favoured nation status to Pakistan unilaterally and Pakistan has taken so much time.” India granted Pakistan MFN status way back in 1996, but Islamabad so far held out on reciprocating because of opposition from some trade lobbies and religious and hardline political parties which contended that such a move would harm the country’s stand on the Kashmir issue.

http://www.dawn.com/2011/11/05/civilians-military-consulted-on-india-trade.html

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers