Dawn – Afghan “Gandhi” Ramazan Bashardost seeks end to foreign interference

Saleem Javed

The outspoken, charismatic and idealist Dr Ramazan Bashardost – friend of humans, as his last name translates – is a member of the Afghan Parliament, a former planning minister and an independent candidate for the upcoming presidential elections.

Dr Bashardost stood third in 2009 presidential elections. As Hamid Karzai failed to get 50 per cent plus one vote, he had to compete in a runoff with the second-placed candidate Abdullah Abdullah, who refused the runoff.

“According to the Afghan constitution, it was my right to be in that runoff but (Hillary) Clinton declared Hamid Karzai the winner from Washington DC. I was a clear winner had the elections not been rigged,” he claimed.

Born in Qarabagh district of the Ghazni province in central Afghanistan, Bashardost received primary and intermediate education in Qarabagh and later in Maimana, capital of Faryab province in northern Afghanistan. Soon after the 1978 coup d’etat, Bashardost left Afghanistan for Iran. He finished high school in Iran and then immigrated to Pakistan.

In 1983, he left Pakistan for France where he spent over 20 years, earning degrees in law and political science. In 1989 he enrolled at Garonable University where he earned a masters degree in law. In 1990, he did his Masters in Diplomacy from Paris University. In 1992, he did his Masters in Political Science. He earned three master’s degrees and a doctorate in political science at the University of Toulouse, France.

During the 2009 elections, Bashardost claims to have travelled to 24 of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces on public transport to preach his message of peace, social justice and non-violence. In a unique and unprecedented move he used to sell his posters and promotional DVDs to his fans as a source of income for the election campaign.

Nicknamed the “Gandhi of Afghanistan”, Bashardost was recently invited to deliver a lecture on the Afghanistan crisis at Gothenburg University in Sweden, where he spoke about president Hamid Karzai’s incompetence and the US-lead Nato forces’ failure in establishing peace and countering drug trafficking as well as terrorism.

For this interview, held after his speech at Gothenburg University, the presidential hopeful was dressed in traditional Afghan dress with its collar lined with the colours of the Afghan flag. Bashardost was, as usual, carrying piles of folders and files that he said were the ‘documents of corruption’ he would present to the European people, “whose taxes were being paid to protect the warlords, criminals and terrorists in Afghanistan.”

While vociferously criticising Nato, Hamid Karzai and the warlords for their failure to bring peace in the country, he backed his arguments with evidences he claimed to have received from some “honest Afghan officials.”

“The Taliban would have totally vanished if the coalition forces and Karzai regime were sincere in their efforts to bring about peace in Afghanistan,” he claimed.

“Billions of dollars were poured into Afghanistan but all were wasted by the corrupt government and NGOs. To me they are No-Good-Guys,” he added.

He resigned as planning minister in 2005, when the government refused to take actions against some 2,000 NGOs, which were allegedly declared ‘corrupt’ by his ministry.

“Nobody is with the Afghan people. The foreigners have their own agenda in their so-called war on terror/war against Taliban and, you know, Hamid Karzai calls Mullah Omar a ‘brother’.”

“Yes, they are all brothers—in drug trafficking ….in committing crimes against humanity. It’s not only me saying this.

Ask Ali Ahmed Jalali (former interior minister) for all the details. Read the newspapers about the involvement of Hamid Karzai’s brother in drug trade.”

As he continued naming some sources he also referred to United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC’s) report stating that drug trade generated 60 billion dollars in revenue for drug traffickers under the very nose of US-led Nato forces. “Corruption and drug trade are practically legal in today’s Afghanistan,” he summed it up, a bit furiously.

After wining a parliamentary seat with second highest number of votes from Kabul city, Dr Bashardost built “Tent of the Nation” outside Afghan parliament to be easily accessible to the ordinary people and distributed his salary among the needy.

“The orphans of Bush and Taliban with necktie (referring to Jihad leaders, Hamid Karzai and affiliates) are not accessible to the common people. ‘Due to security reasons’, they would excuse. But the fact is that they do not trust the people of Afghanistan.”

In a country torn apart by successive wars and ethnic divisions, Bashardost said he will continue with his efforts to unite the people: “I am the only politician who can travel across Afghanistan without any bodyguard. I set an example that you can win an election and create a national unity without a penny, without any foreign support and without a gun.

I have shown a road less travelled by. Gandhi succeeded in the same way,” he said, recounting his achievements.

When asked who he would prefer from amongst the US-led Nato forces, Hamid Karzai, Taliban and Jihad leaders, Bashardost was quick to respond: “Faces of the same coin. Apparently they fight against each other but they share the benefit – the benefit of war. One thing must be clear: We can not build a new system with old people. We can not build democracy in Afghanistan with the enemy of Afghanistan”

With the increasing anxiety among the majority of Afghans about the withdrawal of coalition forces in 2014, fear of Taliban’s return and yet another civil war, Bashardost predicts no big a change in the near future.

“If the international community and Obama administration decide to stop the war, it will end within a week. The US is trying to remain in Afghanistan as long as possible,” he explained.

There are rumours of disintegration of Afghanistan, demands for establishment of a federal system based on ethnic lines and decentralisation of current political system as a solution for the crisis. The country’s powerful opposition alliance, The National Front of Afghanistan, lead by Ahmed Zia Masoud, Mohammad Mohaqeq and Rasheed Dostum are already out for a change in constitution for a more decentralised model of the government.

However, Bashardost is of the view that “all such promises are made by the US and other Western politicians to appease the opposition on one hand and to pressurise the Karzai regime on the other hand for their own benefits. If not, a  disintegrated or even a decentralised Afghanistan is not in their interest.”

Contrary to what most of the Af-Pak analysts consider the Durand Line issue as a main source of tensions between the two neighbouring countries of Afghanistan and Pakistan, Bashardost thinks “it is a fake issue created by the ruling elite to divert public attention from the core issue i.e. is the corrupt leadership in both countries. If Pakistan is worried about the issue, it should naturally support the non-Pashtuns who are not interested in the Durand Line. But Pakistan has supported Taliban who will never recognise the Durand Line as a border between the two countries.”

Pakistan has always expressed concerns over India’s huge presence in Afghanistan and therefore justifies it’s interference. According to Bashardost, “the people of these countries have no issues with each other at all. It’s the minority ruling elite who terrifies their people in the name of national security. Billions of dollars are spent in buying weapons while millions of people are deprived of basic necessities of life”

If elected as president of Afghanistan, Bashardost said that he would set Kabul as his political Kaaba, not Washington, Islamabad, Dehli, Tehran or Moscow. And suggested that end of foreign interference and free-and-fair elections are the only solution to Afghanistan crisis.

“I’ll spend the tax payer’s money for my country’s welfare i.e. education, health, infrastructure etc, not against the neighbouring countries. In turn, I would ask them to do the same. It is on my agenda to create friendly relations with all the neighbouring countries based on mutual respect and equality so that one day we will come forward to agree upon an EU style union in South and Central Asia.” He added.

Bashardost in a special message to the people of Pakistan said that “all ordinary people in Afghanistan and Pakistan share the same destiny. There is no enmity between the common people. It’s therefore our mutual responsibility to force our leaders to concentrate on the welfare of the people rather than meddling in each other’s affairs.”

Despite his claims and promises of a better future for Afghanistan, it remains to be seen if Dr Bashardost is a dreamer or simply cashing in on the widely reported corruption and inefficiency of the Karzai government.

Dr Saleem Javed is a freelance journalist and human rights activist from Quetta. He tweets at @mSaleemJaved and can be reached at dr.saleemjavid@gmail.com

http://dawn.com/2012/11/15/afghanistans-gandhi-ramazan-bashardost-seeks-end-to-foreign-interference/

Dawn – Triple attacks kill 12 in Afghanistan

Kabul, 9 May 2012. Afghan officials say seven Afghan policemen, four Education Ministry employees and a body guard have been killed in three separate attacks.

Gawas Malayar, deputy police chief in Farah province, says a roadside bomb killed five police officers Tuesday in Pusht Rod district in western Afghanistan.

Din Mohammad Darwesh, a spokesman for the governor of Logar province in the east, says two other policemen were killed Tuesday when Taliban militants ambushed them in a bazaar near the provincial capital of Pul-e-Alam.

Khorshid Aman, the chief of Urgun district of Paktika province, says a group of employees of the Education Ministry was traveling from the district to the provincial capital of Sharan when the militants ambushed their two vehicles.

The top education official in the province and one other person in the group also were wounded in Tuesday’s attack.

Separately, Afghan President Hamid Karzai spoke on the phone Tuesday to relatives of civilians killed in Nato airstrikes that he says run the risk of turning the recently signed US-Afghan partnership agreement into a “meaningless” document.

http://dawn.com/2012/05/09/triple-attacks-kill-12-in-afghanistan/

Published in: on May 9, 2012 at 5:54 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , ,

Dawn – Gilani asks envoys to safeguard Pakistan’s interests

Islamabad: Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani on Tuesday said Pakistan would not accept flagrant transgression of its territorial frontiers and there can be no compromise on sovereignty, dignity and national honour.

Addressing the concluding session of two-day envoys’ conference of Pakistan’s ambassadors and diplomats here at Foreign Office, the prime minister said the aerial attacks on Pakistan’s Army border posts on November 26 constituted a huge setback to the prospects of much-needed cooperation between all important stakeholders.

Referring to some of the bold decisions taken by the government following the Nato attacks, the prime minister said a broad-ranging review of cooperation with US/Nato/Isaf was ordered and the two-day envoy’s conference was part of this exercise.

Gilani said the National Security Committee of the Parliament has been mandated to undertake a detailed study of the 26/11 attacks and to make recommendations on the terms of cooperation with US/Nato/Isaf.

These will be considered by the Joint Sitting of the Parliament, he added.

The prime minister said Pakistan was compelled to take these steps to safeguard its interests.

“As a responsible state, Pakistan will do whatever we can for stability and peace of our region but we will never allow anyone to undermine our legitimate interests,” he said.

Referring to future relations of Pakistan with United States, he said the cooperation with US/Nato/Isaf was based on respect for Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

He said, “We expect the US/Nato/Isaf inquiry that is being undertaken to come out clearly with the facts and provide answers to the disturbing questions that our own investigations have raised.”

Gilani said “at this particular point in time, it is imperative that all efforts should be directed for promoting durable stability and peace in Afghanistan.”

The prime minister said all principal stakeholders must be on the same page.

“We have continued to seek clarity and advocated the need for coherence, coordination and cooperation,” he added.

Gilani said Pakistan’s foreign policy is based on immutable principles.

He said, “The Charter of the United Nations, norms of inter-state conduct and international law provide the framework for our endeavours to ensure peace and security – both in our own region and the world.”

The prime minister said Pakistan has been making sincere and consistent efforts to reach out to immediate and distant neighbours to develop the best of relations.

“Sovereign equality, mutual respect and mutually beneficial cooperation have been the hallmark of this approach,” he added.

Quoting the example of Afghan refugees, the prime minister said hosting of millions of Afghan refugees for over three decades and enormous sacrifices in the war against terror amply illustrate Pakistan’s commitment to the noble values that are intrinsic to belief and national ethos.

He also appreciated the continued efforts of the Foreign Office in ensuring that the diplomacy has the resilience and efficacy to overcome all challenges posed by a complex global and regional environment.

He said, “I have every confidence in the ability and professional expertise of our ambassadors and diplomats to safeguard Pakistan’s interests.”

http://www.dawn.com/2011/12/13/gilani-asks-envoys-to-safeguard-pakistan%e2%80%99s-interests.html

BBC News – Pakistan considers taxing Nato Afghanistan trucks

12 December 2011

akistan is considering charging millions of dollars in annual taxes on Nato trucks and fuel tankers, officials have told the BBC.

The vehicles pass through Pakistan on their way to Afghanistan.

The charges might include taxes on fuel in addition to port and storage fees, they said.

The supply route is a lifeline for Nato troops but Pakistan closed it last month after 24 of its soldiers were killed in a Nato air strike.

Thousands of tankers are now stranded.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani told the BBC that Pakistan may continue its blocking of Nato convoys into Afghanistan for several weeks.

On the same day, gunmen attacked tankers stranded in the province of Balochistan for the second time in four days.

The attackers shot dead a driver and destroyed seven tankers.

Pakistan stopped the convoys in protest at US air strikes that killed the 24 troops at two checkpoints on the Afghan border.

Mr Gilani refused to rule out closing Pakistan’s airspace to the US.

Credibility gap  

The air strikes on 26 November marked a new low point in relations between Washington and Islamabad, which have long been strained by the US-led military campaign against militants in Afghanistan.

In a wide-ranging interview with the BBC, Mr Gilani said Pakistan and the US needed to trust each other more.

“Yes there is a credibility gap, we are working together and still we don’t trust each other,” he said.

“I think we have to improve our relationship so that… we should have more confidence in each other.”

Nato forces in Afghanistan rely significantly on overland supply routes from the Pakistani sea port of Karachi, which enter Afghanistan through the Khyber Pass.

Hundreds of lorries have been camped out next to border crossings, waiting for the crisis to blow over.

Nato has apologised for the air strikes, calling them a “tragic unintended incident”.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16145380

The Tribune – Pakistan empowers military to shoot down drones; New defence policy unveiled

Islamabad, December 11. The Pakistani military will shoot down any US drone that intrudes the country’s airspace under a new defence policy in which troops have been given greater liberty to respond to incursions by NATO and allied forces in Afghanistan, according to a media report.

“Any object entering into our airspace, including US drones, will be treated as hostile and be shot down,” a senior unnamed Pakistani military official was quoted as saying by NBC News.

The defence policy was changed after a NATO air strike on two military border posts killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on November 26.

Following the air strike, Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani issued a communiqué that gave troops in the field full liberty to respond to any future attacks without consulting their superiors.

Kayani issued multiple directives since the November 26 attack, including orders to shoot down US drones, senior military officials said.

Pakistan also shut down all NATO supply routes and asked the US to vacate the Shamsi airfield in Balochistan province by December 11.

The airbase is reportedly used by CIA-operated drones that target militants in the tribal areas along the Afghan border.

A senior military official in Quetta, the capital of Balochistan, told NBC News yesterday that the evacuation of the airbase would be completed within the deadline.

Pakistan’s paramilitary Frontier Corps took control of the airbase last evening after most US military personnel left.

Civil aviation officials too moved in yesterday. (PTI)

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20111212/main3.htm

Dawn – Steps to implement DCC decision taken

Syed Irfan Raza

28 November 2011

Islamabad: Sunday saw a flurry of activities in the capital as the government went into overdrive to express its anger over the Nato air strike that took place in the early hours of Saturday.

While the American administration was informed of the decisions taken by the Defence Committee of the Cabinet, including the blocking of the Nato supply routes as well as the deadline to vacate Shamsi airbase, the opposition raised questions about the preparedness of the military personnel who had been killed in the attack.

In accordance with the DCC decision, Pakistan suspended Nato supplies to Afghanistan and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was informed about it.

Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar spoke to Ms Clinton by telephone in the early hours of Sunday, conveying the decisions taken by the DCC.

Talking to reporters, Interior Minister Rehman Malik claimed that the supply of Nato had not been suspended, but “stopped permanently” in line with DCC’s decisions.

He said all other decisions of the DCC would be implemented in letter and spirit. “The decisions of the DCC are final and would be implemented.”

The minister said Nato containers, which had been stopped, would not be allowed to cross the border into Afghanistan.

According to a statement issued by the Foreign Office, the foreign minister conveyed “deep sense of rage felt across Pakistan” over loss of 28 soldiers and told Ms Clinton that “such attacks are totally unacceptable”.

She said that such strikes demonstrated complete disregard for international law and human life and were in stark violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

The foreign minister was quoted as saying: “This negates the progress made by the two countries on improving relations and forces Pakistan to revisit the terms of engagement.”

She also informed Ms Clinton about the DCC decision that the US should vacate the Shamsi airbase within 15 days. The US secretary of state offered condolences over the loss of life, the statement said.

Ms Clinton said she was deeply saddened by the event and conveyed the US government’s desire to work with Pakistan to resolve the issue.

Meanwhile, the military authorities negated the US claim that Nato had carried out strikes after its helicopters had come under fire from the ground.

“These were lame excuses that the attack was made after Pakistani soldiers opened fire on Nato forces or that Nato forces were chasing the Taliban in the area,” said Inter-Services Public Relations Director General Major-Geneneral Athar Abbas.

Nato has already been communicated about two Pakistani posts in Mohmand Agency called ‘Golden’ and ‘Volcano’ on the top of the height in the area with national flag hoisted over them. “Even then they were attacked,” he said.

He said Mohmand Agency had been cleared of militants during the four-month operation and there was no militants’ hideout in the area. Therefore, he said, the US claim that Nato forces were chasing the Taliban was ‘ill-logical’.

General Abbas said the Nato attacks continued for a long time during which the military’s General Headquarters contacted the Nato authorities and apprised them of the aerial attacks. However, Nato officials did not take any action to stop such provocative strikes.

Asked if Pakistan will be involved in investigation announced by the Nato chief to probe into the incident, he said the modus operandi of the investigation was yet to be decided.

President-PM Meeting: President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani met at the presidency and discussed the Nato attacks for the second consecutive day.

Sources in the presidency told Dawn that the president and the prime minister were worried that the Nato strikes had taken place soon after the ‘memogate’ that had soured relations between the civilian set-up and the military establishment.

Opposition: Calling for a joint session of parliament to debate the Nato air strike, Leader of Opposition in the National Assembly Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan questioned at a news conference why army officers and soldiers had been caught unawares and unprepared.

The PML-N leader said that although he considered the present rulers mainly responsible for the killings of soldiers, the military leadership could not be absolved completely of its responsibility.

Not only the rulers, but even Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani had in the past threatened to retaliate if the US carried out drone attacks, he said, adding that the drone attacks were continuing and there had been no response from the military.

He said the May 2 Abbottabad incident and recent Nato air strikes on security posts had raised many questions about the defence preparedness of the armed forces. Was there any arrangement to provide the soldiers a cover at the posts against any aggression? he asked. He said if anti-aircraft guns are installed at these posts. “If the guns are there then why these were not used?”

He said: “Previously former army chief General Pervez Musharraf sent the troops to the top of a hill at Kargil and later left them to be killed.”

Chaudhry Nisar said soldiers in such a large number could not be killed simply by strafing if they had been in bunkers.

When asked if his party wanted a commission to investigate the incident, he said first the replies to these questions should be presented in parliament.

The PML-N leader said his party wanted a joint session of parliament within a few days much before Ashura. He demanded that it should be an open session because the time had come for the nation to be informed about facts.

He welcomed the decisions taken by the DCC, but raised serious doubts about their implementation. He regretted that the government did not take any step to implement the resolutions adopted by parliament and the all-party conference.

Chaudhry Nisar claimed that it was the PML-N which had raised the issue of Shamsi airbase in a joint session of parliament and demanded that its foreign control must be ended.

Despite an announcement by the government that the US had been asked to vacate the airbase in Balochistan, it is not clear who controls the base.

When asked what would be the line of action if the US did not vacate the base in 15 days as recommended by the DCC, ISPR director general Major-General Athar Abbas said “Speculative. Speculative means we will cross the bridge when it comes.”

During a briefing to parliament in June in the aftermath of the killing of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, top military officials had disclosed that the airfield, long suspected of housing US drones, was actually not a Pakistan Air Force facility and its control had been handed over to the United Arab Emirates in 1990s.

Later, in an interview with AP a UAE official denied that his country had any operational role in the base, although he said that wealthy Arabs occasionally used it to fly to Pakistan on hunting expeditions.

The US reportedly used the airbase as a forward staging point in the initial period after it invaded Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. Reports surfaced in the media in 2008 that the drones used in attacks on tribal areas were taking off from the Shamsi airfield.

Two weeks after the parliamentary briefing, Defence Minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar said that Pakistan had asked the US to withdraw its forces from the airbase and that it would be vacated soon.

The minister had even claimed that the Americans had started moving equipment and materials from the airbase. A defence ministry official had stated that the government had decided to get the base vacated because of a significant reduction in the flow of US funds and growing trust deficit between the two countries.

A US Embassy spokesperson at that time stated that there were no US military personnel at the base.

Attempts were made to contact officials of the US Embassy in Islamabad to get its version over the government decision to get the airbase vacated, but there was no response.

http://www.dawn.com/2011/11/28/steps-to-implement-dcc-decision-taken.html

BBC News – Pakistan orders Nato and US review after deadly border strike

27 November 2011

Pakistan has ordered a review of all co-operation with the US and Nato after the alliance struck a Pakistani army checkpoint, killing at least 24 people.

A committee chaired by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani also decided to cut supply lines to Nato in Afghanistan.

A Nato spokesman admitted it was “highly likely” that Nato aircraft were behind the strike at the Afghan border.

The US has stressed the importance of its relationship and said it fully backed Nato’s plan to investigate.

Nato’s Brigadier General Carsten Jacobson sent condolences to Pakistan and said the alliance was investigating how the incident occurred.

Ambassador summoned   Mr Gilani called the attack a “grave infringement of Pakistan’s sovereignty”.

The BBC’s Orla Guerin in Islamabad says this could be a very costly mistake by Nato, which relies heavily on the route through Pakistan to supply its personnel involved in the war in Afghanistan.

A meeting of the cabinet’s defence committee, convened by Mr Gilani, decided the government would “revisit and undertake a complete review of all programmes, activities and co-operative arrangements with US/Nato/Isaf, including diplomatic, political, military and intelligence”.

It “decided to close with immediate effect Nato/Isaf logistics supply lines”, according to a statement issued by Mr Gilani’s office.

Reports appeared to confirm that Nato traffic was not being allowed through Pakistan’s two border crossings with Afghanistan, at Torkham and Chaman.

The committee also said the United States would be asked to vacate, within 15 days, the Shamsi air base, which the US has used to launch drones.

However, our correspondent notes that Pakistan has made a similar demand before and the base may already be empty.

Pakistan’s government also summoned the US ambassador.

Late on Saturday, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released a statement saying they offered their “deepest condolences for the loss of life and support fully Nato’s intention to investigate immediately”.

They stressed the “importance of the US-Pakistani partnership, which serves the mutual interests of our people” and pledged to remain in close contact with their Pakistani counterparts, the AFP news agency quoted the statement as saying.

Special forces   The night-time attack took place at the Salala checkpoint, about 1.5 miles (2.5 km) from the Afghan border, at around 02:00 on Saturday morning local time (21:00 GMT Friday).

The Pakistani army said helicopters and fighter aircraft hit two border posts, killing 24 people and leaving 13 injured.

Local officials said the two posts were about 300m apart on a mountain top.

Pakistani officials said there had been no militant activity in the area, and most of the Pakistani soldiers were asleep.

They also said Nato had the grid references of the posts and therefore should not have fired.

Nick Childs, BBC defence and security correspondent

This may not have been the first incident of its kind on the Afghan-Pakistan border, but it is certainly shaping up to be the worst.

There are two very different, if incomplete versions of events. The two sides will probably have to talk to each other to sort it out, if sensitivities allow.

Cross-border tensions, and how to deal with the movements of militants back-and-forth, have been a running sore in relations between the governments of Kabul and Islamabad, and with the Nato-led force.

But relations between Washington and Islamabad have also soured over a string of wider tensions, including in the aftermath of the US raid into Pakistan in May that killed Osama Bin Laden.

In this atmosphere of undoubted ill-feeling, defusing this latest crisis will be a challenge for both sides.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-15905777

Dawn – Pakistan protests attack ‘in strongest terms’ with Nato, US

26 November 2011

Islamabad: Pakistan on Saturday lodged a protest “in the strongest terms” with Nato and the United States over an attack on a Paksitani border post, which security officials said killed 20 soldiers.

“Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has strongly condemned the Nato/ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) attack on the Pakistani post,” the foreign ministry announced.

“On his directions, the matter in being taken up by the foreign ministry, in the strongest terms, with Nato and the US,” it added. (AFP)

http://www.dawn.com/2011/11/26/pakistan-protests-attack-in-strongest-terms-with-nato-us.html

Published in: on November 26, 2011 at 5:56 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

BBC News – Afghanistan militant attack on Kandahar compound ‘ends’

28 October 2011

A militant attack on a compound housing Western officials and military personnel in the Afghan city of Kandahar has been repelled, Nato said.

The attack began on Thursday and lasted more than 15 hours, a spokesman said.

The Taliban said they were behind the attack which included rocket-propelled grenades and small arms fire.

Four militants and an Afghan interpreter working for the Nato-led international force were killed, police and Nato said.

Five Nato soldiers, two Afghan security guards and three civilians were wounded in the attack, officials said.

Reports said the Taliban launched an assault from a compound across from the camp on Thursday afternoon local time.

Two car bombs went off as the Afghan police were clearing the compound, but there were no injuries, the Associated Press reported.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-15488754

Published in: on October 29, 2011 at 7:15 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 191 other followers