R Sedhuraman, Legal Correspondent
New Delhi, March 11. The Supreme Court today directed Punjab’s Director-General of Police (DGP) and the Tarn Taran district police chief to file their reports within a week on policemen thrashing a woman on March 4 when she approached them to lodge a complaint of sexual harassment against truck/taxi drivers.
“Was that lady a terrorist to be beaten up on the highway,” a Bench comprising GS Singhvi and Joseph Kurian asked Additional Advocate-General Ajay Bansal. Bansal said the state government had ordered a magisterial inquiry and the report would be available in 21 days. The Bench said if the government had been serious on the issue, it would have taken stern steps within 24 hours, thereby sending out a warning to other policemen.
The Bench was also not convinced by the fact that two of the policemen involved in beating up the 22-year-old woman and her father had been suspended. “After three months, they will be reinstated and rewarded for bravery,” the Bench remarked. There was a need for fixing responsibility at a higher level, it said.
Bansal said those who had witnessed the incident were not coming forward to give evidence. At this, the Bench wanted to know as to whether he was wearing coloured glasses. “The incident was witnessed by millions of people on the television. What evidence is required to be given?”
The Bench also said the state government was, perhaps, ordering magisterial inquiries in order to give a burial to such incidents. It observed the Punjab Police had acquired a “particular mindset” while fighting terrorism in the 1980s and this was still continuing with it.
Attorney General GE Vahanvati, who has been asked by the Bench to assist the court on constitutional issues involved in the incident, said such incidents had serious ramifications as, henceforth, people would be scared to approach the police for lodging complaints against perpetrators of crime.
Describing the victim as a “braveheart,” the Bench said she did a wise thing by running away from the lathi-wielding policemen.
The SC has taken suo motu notice of the Tarn Taran incident along with a similar police action against contractual teachers demonstrating outside the state assembly at Patna on March 5. Pointing out that both the Tarn Taran and Patna incidents undermined people’s right to life, liberty and dignity, the Bench said these were not isolated happenings. “Such incidents are frequently happening in different parts of the country,” the SC remarked.
The Bench enlarged the scope of the suo motu PIL and issued notices to the Centre and all the states and union territories, seeking details on the implementation of apex court guidelines on police reforms issued in a case filed by former Uttar Pradesh DGP Prakash Singh.
The Bench will hear the case again on April 1.
‘Was that lady a terrorist to be beaten up on the highway…if the state government had been serious on the issue, it would have taken stern steps within 24 hours, thereby sending out a warning to other policemen’ (Supreme Court Bench).
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20130312/punjab.htm#8