BBC News – India-US talks held to deepen trade and security

Thursday 14 June 2012. India and the US have held talks to deepen defence trade and co-operation in maritime and cyber security.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Indian Foreign Minister S M Krishna met for their annual strategic dialogue in Washington on Wednesday.

The two discussed issues ranging from Afghanistan and Pakistan to counter-terrorism and women’s empowerment.

The talks were held days after the US exempted India from sanctions in return for cutting imports of Iranian oil.

After Wednesday’s talks, Mrs Clinton spoke about a “closer convergence” of strategic interests between the US and India.

She welcomed the progress made in the US efforts to invest in India’s civilian nuclear industry.

Mr Krishna said India planned to invest $1 trillion in infrastructure over the next five years, offering enormous business opportunities to US companies.

“India and US support the growing emphasis on defence technology transfers and co-development and co-production in our expanding defence relationship,” he said.

Correspondents say defence is now a key area of cooperation, with India signing more than $9bn in defence trade contracts with the US.

Trade has grown from $9bn in 1995 to $100bn this year.

But there are areas of concern – the US wants India to allow greater access to American firms, and a landmark nuclear deal has not delivered the lucrative contracts it promised to.

Over the past few months, a number of senior members of the US administration have visited Delhi, including Mrs Clinton and Defence Secretary Leon Panetta.

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is expected in the Indian capital at the end of June.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-18437236

Dawn – Foreign Ministry rejects Panetta’s comments on militant safe havens

Islamabad, 9 June 2012. Pakistan on Saturday rejected US Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta’s recent comments on militant safe havens in Pakistan.

“We feel that the Secretary of Defence is oversimplifying some of the very complex issues we are all dealing with in our efforts against extremism and terrorism,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

“We strongly believe that such statements are misplaced and unhelpful in bringing about peace and stability in the region.”

Panetta said on Thursday during a trip to Afghanistan that stabilisation efforts in Afghanistan would remain difficult as long as militants had safe havens in Pakistan.

“It is very important for Pakistan to take steps. It is an increasing concern, the issue of safe haven, and we are reaching the limits of our patience,” he said, using some of the strongest language from a senior US official on Washington’s strained relations with Islamabad.

US officials often describe Pakistan as an unreliable partner in the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and demand tougher action against militant groups, especially those said to be based in Pakistan’s tribal regions.

The United States wants Pakistan to go after the Haqqani group, which is close to the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda, and is blamed for some of the deadliest attacks on Western forces in Afghanistan.

“Pakistan has repeatedly said that it will not allow its territory to be used against any country, nor will it allow any safe havens on its territory,” the Foreign Ministry said on Saturday, adding that Islamabad will “follow its own timeline” and strategy on operations against militants.

http://dawn.com/2012/06/09/foreign-ministry-rejects-panettas-comments-on-militant-safe-havens/

Dawn – US warns running out of patience with Pakistan

Kabul, 8 June 2012. Defence Secretary Leon Panetta warned Pakistan on Thursday that Washington is losing patience over its failure to eliminate safe havens for insurgents who attack US troops in neighbouring Afghanistan.

Panetta lashed out at Pakistan and the al Qaeda-linked Haqqani network during a brief visit to Kabul overshadowed by fury over a Nato air strike that allegedly killed 18 civilians, an issue that the Pentagon chief did not address in public.

Panetta left Kabul less than five hours after his arrival, as Afghan President Hamid Karzai pledged to cut short a trip to Beijing and head home over the deaths of around 40 civilians Wednesday in the air strike and a suicide bombing.

“Even though we are seeing an uptick in violence in recent days, the overall level of violence is down from past years,” said Panetta, who is assessing plans to withdraw US combat troops by the end of 2014.

The Haqqani group, a faction linked to the Taliban and al Qaeda that is believed to be based in Pakistan’s lawless tribal district of North Waziristan, is blamed for some of the deadliest attacks in Afghanistan’s 10-year war.

“It’s an increasing concern that this safe haven exists and that there are those like the Haqqanis who are making use of that to attack our forces,” Panetta told a news conference with his Afghan counterpart, Abdul Rahim Wardak.

“We are reaching the limits of our patience here,” he said.

“For that reason, it’s extremely important that Pakistan take action to prevent this kind of safe haven,” he said.

“We have made that very clear time and time again and we will continue to do that. But as I said, we are reaching the limits of our patience,” he added.

The Afghan and US governments have suggested the war in Afghanistan cannot be won unless safe havens in Pakistan are dismantled.

Analysts say Islamabad allows the Haqqanis to operate to hedge against any influence by their arch-foe India in Afghanistan, while critics in Pakistan accuse the Americans of deflecting blame for the increasingly deadly war.

The Pentagon chief said the Haqqani network was to blame for an attack last week on Forward Operating Base Salerno in eastern Afghanistan.

US military chief General Martin Dempsey, asked about Panetta’s remarks, said the strong words on Pakistan were largely because the Haqqani network was more active in eastern Afghanistan, where the transition from Nato forces is expected to be particularly difficult.

Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters in Washington that he shared Panetta’s frustration but acknowledged that Pakistani forces were fighting militants on parts of their own soil.

“Make no mistake about it: Although we are extraordinarily dissatisfied with the effect that Pakistan has had on the Haqqanis, we are also mindful that they are conducting military operations – at great loss, by the way,” he said.

The United States leads 130,000 Nato troops fighting the Taliban insurgency and is planning to withdraw the bulk of combat forces from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, and hand responsibility for security to the Afghans.

But civilian casualties caused by US and Nato air strikes have been a frequent source of tension between Karzai and the United States.

The Afghan president, who was attending a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation in Beijing, issued a stinging rebuke of Nato’s latest air strike.

“Attacks by Nato that cause life and property losses to civilians under no circumstances could be justified and are not acceptable,” Karzai said of the incident on Wednesday in Logar province, south of Kabul.

Karzai “will shorten his trip to China and will very soon return to the country” following the deaths in Logar and those from a Kandahar suicide bombing on the same day, his office said.

Nato’s US-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said “multiple insurgents” were killed in the air strike, which was ordered after troops came under fire during an operation against a Taliban commander.

Local police said that 18 civilians, including women and children, were killed in the strike. Dempsey promised an investigation.

The air strike did not come up in Thursday’s talks between Panetta and Wardak, a senior US defence official told AFP.

For the past five years the number of civilians killed in the war has risen steadily, reaching a record of 3,021 in 2011, with the vast majority caused by insurgents, the United Nations says.

In Kandahar on Wednesday, 23 civilians were killed when two Taliban bombers blew themselves up at a makeshift bazaar and truck stop near a major Nato base.

Panetta’s stop in Kabul came at the end of a nine-day tour with stops in Singapore, Vietnam and India, in which he touted a US strategic shift toward Asia after a decade of war.

http://dawn.com/2012/06/08/us-warns-running-out-of-patience-with-pakistan/

The Tribune – Worried over US’ defence focus on Asia, India tells Panetta to re-calibrate strategy

Ajay Banerjee, Tribune News Service

New Delhi, June 6. Worried over United States’ new defence focus on Asia, New Delhi today told Washington to re-calibrate its strategy, as India fears that it could lead to increased militarisation of its neighbourhood.

The two sides also reached an understanding that will enable transfer of cutting edge defence technology to India. At a bilateral meeting, Defence Minister AK Antony today told his US counterpart, Secretary Defence Leon Panetta “to move at a pace (in implementing the new military strategy) which is comfortable to all countries concerned.” India was concerned at the eastward swing of the US, officials said.

Under its new strategy, termed as ‘re-balancing’, the US wants 60 per cent of its naval assets, including six sea-borne aircraft carriers, under its Pacific Area Command (PACOM). India is under the area of influence of the PACOM, the US perceives.

China has already termed the new US policy as “untimely.”

Sources explained that India’s worry is Bay of Bengal turning into a volatile zone. China already has a naval base in Hangyyi Myanmar, the US is seeking berthing right at Chittagong port in Bangladesh while India is based in good numbers at Port Blair (Andaman Nicobar Islands).

In the hour-long meeting, Panetta appreciated India’s move to maintain ties with Pakistan while terming the India-Pakistan and USA-Pakistan relations as ‘complicated’. “India and the US will need to continue to engage Pakistan, overcoming our respective – and often deep – differences with Pakistan”, Panetta said. Washington made it clear that it does not seek Indian troops in Afghanistan. However, it wants New Delhi to continue supporting the country through “trade investments, reconstruction and help for Afghan security forces” beyond the December 2014 deadline when international forces start withdrawing.

In a major policy shift, the US dropped its demand that India must sign two umbrella defence agreements. The Logistics Support Agreement (LSA) and the Communications, Interoperability and Security Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA), which had been the irritants, were not discussed today. Panetta made it clear “these are not issues anymore”.

During the discussion, Antony wanted both countries to move beyond the buyer-seller transactions and focus on transfer of technologies and partnerships. Panetta assured the Indian side that the US will facilitate technology access and sharing.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120607/main2.htm

BBC News – US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta in surprise Afghan visit

Wednesday, 14 March 2012. US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta has arrived in Afghanistan on a previously unannounced visit, officials say.

They say the trip was planned before 16 Afghan civilians were shot dead by an American soldier on Sunday.

Mr Panetta is due to have talks with President Hamid Karzai, provincial leaders and senior officials.

Correspondents say his visit has taken on a new meaning as political pressure mounts on Afghan and US officials over the unpopular war.

The defence secretary is also due to speak with US troops in Afghanistan as fears mount that they could be the victims of a Taliban-led backlash over the killings of villagers, including nine children, by the rogue US soldier.

His arrival at Bastion Airfield in Helmand province came a day after protests over the massacre flared in the eastern city of Jalalabad.

Mr Panetta is the most senior US official to visit Afghanistan since the shootings.

He told reporters ahead of his trip that he believed that American strategy in Afghanistan was working and would withstand repercussions from the killings.

“I think we’re on the right path now and what we’ve got to do is convince people that despite these kinds of events we ought not to allow these events to undermine that strategy,” he said on Monday.

His trip coincides with discussions in the US between UK Prime Minster David Cameron and President Barack Obama over a possible “endgame” to the war in Afghanistan.

The leaders are expected to agree that Afghan forces should take over a lead combat role by mid-2013 – earlier than planned – but the US president has said there will be no “rush for the exits”.

Correspondents say that anti-Americanism was rampant in Afghanistan even before the shootings.

Last month there was outrage over US troops inadvertently burning Korans on an American base.

Fury also followed the posting of a video on the internet in January apparently showing four US marines urinating on Taliban corpses.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17363675

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers