The Asian Age – Jailed ex-Pak PM Nawaz Sharif’s wife, Begum Kulsoom, dies in London

The 68-year-old former first lady was diagnosed with lymphoma (throat) cancer in August 2017

Shafqat Ali

Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan, 11 September 2018. Begum Kulsoom Nawaz, wife of former Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, passed away in London on Tuesday after suffering from complications related to cancer.

The 68-year-old former first lady was diagnosed with lymphoma (throat) cancer in August 2017. She married Nawaz Sharif in April 1971.

Begum Kulsoom had contested and won NA-120, a traditional bastion of the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) after the seat fell vacant following Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification by the Supreme Court (SC) in the Panama Papers case.

Crucial to the PML-N, she ensured the party remained functional during the most difficult of times. She contested for the NA-120 seat despite her failing health and secured 59,413 votes and defeated Yasmin Rashid of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI).

During her husband’s exile after the 1999 military coup by Pervez Musharraf, Begum Kulsoom Nawaz took over reins of the party and served as its president from 1999 to 2002.

Referring to her mother, Maryam Nawaz had said that she had dauntlessly challenged a usurper when “most men did not”. Born into a Kashmiri family in Punjab, she graduated from Forman Christian College University.

Nawaz and Begum Kulsoom Nawaz married in 1971 and had four children; Hassan, Hussain, Maryam and Asma.

On 23 August 2017, UK doctors confirmed that Kulsoom Nawaz was suffering from cancer and was shifted to London for medical care. Since then, Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz have been making trips back and forth to visit ailing Kulsoom Nawaz. On June 15, she was placed on a ventilator after suffering a cardiac arrest.

Both her sons Hassan and Hussain reside in the UK and cared for her while Nawaz and Maryam attended near daily hearings of the corruption trial.

Prime Minister Imran Khan has expressed deep grief and sorrow over the sad demise of Kulsoom Nawaz.

In a statement, he said all facilities will be provided to the family and heirs of Kulsoom Nawaz as per law.

The Prime Minister has directed Pakistani High Commission in London to assist in provision of all necessary facilities to the heirs of the deceased.

PML-N leaders said her funeral will be held in Pakistan. Nawaz Sharif is likely to be allowed to attend the last rites.

The Tribune – Clamour grows for Sikh convicts’ release

Jupinderjit Singh, Tribune News Service

Chandigarh – Panjab – India, 10 September 2018. With the Tamil Nadu government deciding to release all seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, clamour has grown in Punjab for the release of Sikh convicts who have spent 20 years or considerable time in various jails.

Sikh activists and groups have sought the release of the convicts as a goodwill gesture also coinciding with the 550th birth anniversary celebrations of Guru Nanak Dev. Sikh groups have submitted a proposal regarding this to the state government through ministers Tript Rajinder Singh Bajwa and Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa.

These two ministers held talks with the panthic groups recently to urge them to lift the dharna at Bargari.
The demand for the release of these convicts is already included in a charter of demands of various panthic organisations, who are sitting on a dharna at Bargari in Faridkot on the issue of sacrilege incidents.

However, the Police Department has opposed their release on the basis of field reports in each case on the impact of the move.

“From a list of 20 convicts whose release has been demanded, the state government can release two on their own besides pursuing the matter of their release with other state governments,” claimed Jaspal Singh Manjhpur, a human rights activist, who had compiled the list.

Most of these 20 convicts are incarcerated in different Punjab jails. Earlier they were in jails of the states where they were booked for crime but following agitations, including fast unto death, by Sikh activists Gurmukh Singh and Surat Singh Khalsa separately, the convicts were shifted to jails near their home.

Gurmukh Singh died earlier this year.

Manjhpur advocates immediate release of convicts Dilbagh Singh and Balbir Singh.

He said Dilbagh Singh of Atalan village in Smana Tehsil of Patiala had already completed five years of imprisonment under the Terrorist and Disruptive Actívities (Prevention) Act. “He is undergoing life imprisonment for a murder and has spent more than 15 years since 1999.

The government had released a police cat-turned-policemen-turned-killer after he spent nine years and a few months in a murder case. On the same lines, Dilbagh Singh and Balbir Singh can be released also,” he argues.

Balbir Singh, alias Bira, was arrested at the Ludhiana railway station in 2009 after he had shot at and injured two policemen. “He is undergoing life imprisonment but was acquitted of terror charges. He has spent more than nine years,” said Manjhpur.

Gurdeep Singh Bathinda, who is part of the protesting leaders at Bargari and also convener of a committee for release of Sikh convicts, said the Punjab government should follow the example of Tamil Nadu government to release the convicts.

“We had submitted a list of 20 convicts who were eligible for release to the previous and present governments in Punjab,” said Gurdeep.

Gent – Burgstraat – Bevrijdingslaan – Vogelmarkt

28 July 2018

Tram 1 to Flanders Expo

Tram 1 to Wondelgem

28 July 2018

Visible diversity

01 August 2018

Vogelmarkt – Tram 2 to Melle Leeuw

Vogelmarkt – Tram 2 to Melle Leeuw

Vogelmarkt – Tram 2 to Zwijnaarde

I messed up the sequence of the pictures
We jumped back to 20 July and will return to August
in due course.
Man in Blue

To see all my pictures:

More Belgian and UK pictures to be published
Harjinder Singh
Man in Blue

New Indian Express – Rubbing salt into Sikhs’ wounds

The anti-Sikh pogrom began almost immediately after the government announced on the evening of 31 October 1984 that Indira Gandhi had succumbed to the bullets of her assassins.

A Surya Prakash

New Delhi – India, 11 September 2018. Congress President Rahul Gandhi’s assertion that the Grand Old Party was not involved in the barbarous assault on the Sikh community after Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984 flies in the face of truckloads of evidence—placed before several commissions and committees of inquiry that probed the violence.

The testimonies of thousands of witnesses not only established instigation of frenzied mobs by Congress politicians but also the unpardonable paralysis of the administration and police in the national capital and many other cities in North India while the mobs were running amok.

The anti-Sikh pogrom began almost immediately after the government announced on the evening of 31 October 1984 that Indira Gandhi had succumbed to the bullets of her assassins.

As news of her assassination spread, Congress cadres became belligerent, raised slogans like khoon ka badla khoon se lenge (we will avenge blood with blood) and roamed the national capital and cities in the North torching Sikh places of worship, establishments and property.

Rajiv Gandhi was sworn in as PM immediately after the assassination and, technically speaking, a new government was in place. But there was no government. The state had withered away. In all 2,732 Sikhs were killed in those riots, 2,146 in Delhi and 586 in some other towns in northern region.

The Sikhs suffered loss of homes and property on an unprecedented scale.

The Justice Nanavati Commission of Inquiry that probed the riots found shocking evidence of the complicity of the police in the riots in Delhi.

Although the violence was spread all over the national capital, the police had registered only 587 FIRs against the mobsters and even among these, the police declared over 240 cases as “untraced” and around 250 cases ended in acquittals. Further, 11 FIRs were quashed and in another 11 cases, the accused were discharged.

After weighing the evidence that came before it, the commission came to the following conclusions: “Rumours were circulated which had the effect of inciting people against the Sikhs and prompted them to take revenge … At some places the mobs indulging in violent attacks had come in DTC buses or vehicles.

They either came armed with weapons and inflammable materials like kerosene, petrol … or were supplied with such materials soon after they were taken to the localities where the Sikhs were to be attacked … Persons who could organise attacks were contacted and given instructions to kill Sikhs …

The attacks were made in a systematic manner and without much fear of the police, almost suggesting they were assured that they would not be harmed while committing those acts and even thereafter.

Male members of the Sikh community were taken out of their houses and burnt alive. In some cases, tyres were put round their necks and then they were set on fire by pouring kerosene or petrol on them.”

This is a brief account of the graphic description of the cruelty perpetrated by Congress goons that the Commission took note of. As regards those who instigated the murderous mobs, the commission said:

“Large number of affidavits indicate that local Congress(I) leaders and workers had either incited or helped the mobs in attacking the Sikhs. But for the backing and help of influential and resourceful persons, killing of Sikhs so swiftly and in large numbers could not have happened.

In many places the mobs consisted of outsiders … Bringing them from outside required an organised effort.

There is evidence to show that outsiders were shown the houses of the Sikhs.” Further, when Sikhs collected at a gurudwara to defend themselves, the police persuaded them to return to their homes on the assurance they would be protected. But the mobs took over and the police looked the other way, it added.

The Commission said affidavits filed before it state that Congress leaders and workers were behind the riots: “No other person or organisation … is alleged to have taken part in those incidents. The slogans raised during the riots also indicate that some of the persons who constituted the mobs were Congress workers or sympathisers.”

Some material was also put before the commission which said Rajiv told one of his officials that “the Sikhs should be taught a lesson”. The Commission did not pursue this because the evidence available was vague.
However, it indicted the government for the complicity of the police and administration with the rioters and for the inordinate delay in calling in the Army.

The Indian state was in a state of paralysis after Indira’s assassination and this is explained by the shocking non-response of the then President Giani Zail Singh to pleas for protection from the Sikhs.

The noted writer Patwant Singh told the Commission that he was part of a delegation of eminent citizens which called on the president on the morning of November 1.

They told him he had a moral and constitutional obligation to end the violence. The president said he “did not have the power” to intervene. The delegation asked Zail Singh if he was saying he had no power to stop anarchy and bloodshed? “The president remained silent.”

But the delegation persisted and urged the president to speak forcefully to the PM. Zail Singh said, “I will do so in three or four days time”! That was the three or four days in which the mass murder of Sikhs took place.

There is sufficient evidence to indict the Congress on two counts, for unleashing brutality of the worst kind on members of a religious minority and for the government’s collaboration with the perpetrators of violence.

Rahul is only rubbing salt on the wounds of the Sikhs by now claiming that his party was not involved. He must read the Nanavati Commission reports and the affidavits filed before it.

Dawn – Civil society in Islamabad protests ‘forced resignation’ of economist from advisory council

Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan, 11 September 2018. Members of the civil society on Monday staged a protest outside the National Press Club against the ‘forced resignation’ of Dr Atif Mian from the recently-constituted Economic Advisory Council (EAC).

Participants of the protest, organised by Awami Workers party (AWP), decried the PTI government’s ‘Naya Pakistan’ claim.

Former PPP senator Farhatullah Babar described government’s action as stepping on a ‘slippery slope’, adding that “if the government remains on this place it will continue to be blackmailed by the religious elements”.

The civil society activists spoke against the ‘removal’ of a world-renowned economist from the council on the basis of religious affiliation.

Dr Farzana Bari said it was the duty of all Pakistanis to speak up against the systematic use of religion as a political weapon that had now reached epidemic proportions.

AWP leaders Alia Amirali and Ammar Rashid said progressive forces must come together to challenge the status quo.

They said that the AWP welcomed efforts of all progressive forces within and outside the parliament to work together to initiate efforts for curriculum reform and banning of hate speech on media.

Other speakers included Dr A H Nayyar and Tahira Abdullah who slammed the PTI government for taking a U-turn on Atif Mian’s appointment and welcomed all erstwhile PTI supporters who are now starting to realise that building ‘Naya Pakistan’ is nothing but a hollow slogan.