The Telegraph – Amit Shah’s call to rewrite history

“The uprising of 1857 wouldn’t have become a part of our history but for Veer Savarkar,” Shah said

Piyush Srivastava

Lucknow – UP – India, 18 October 2019. Union home minister and BJP president Amit Shah on Thursday urged Indian historians to “rewrite history from an Indian perspective” and held up Hindu Rashtra proponent Vinayak Damodar Savarkar as an exemplar.

“There is a need to rewrite our history. We need to come forward to do so. The historians of the country have a big role to play. It’s our weakness that we couldn’t re-analyse our history,” Shah said after inaugurating a two-day seminar on Skandagupta Vikramaditya, the fifth-century AD emperor, at Banaras Hindu University.

The seminar was titled “Guptavanshak Veer: Skandagupta Vikramaditya”. While “Gutpavanshak veer” means “brave member of the Gupta dynasty”, the title also carries an echo of the sobriquet, “Veer”, that the Sangh parivar attaches to Savarkar (1883-1966), one of its spiritual forbears.

Shah asked the historians to take a leaf out of the book of the freedom fighter and Hindu Mahasabha leader from Maharashtra. “The uprising of 1857 wouldn’t have become a part of our history but for Veer Savarkar,” Shah said.

“It was he who wrote that the uprising of 1857 (portrayed by British historians as a mere mutiny or revolt by sepoys) was the first Indian war of independence. Otherwise, we would have still been looking at this event through the eyes of the British.”

Savarkar had written a Marathi book about the 1857 uprising, calling it India’s first war of Independence. An English translation was published in 1909, titled The Indian War of Independence: 1857.

Savarkar was arrested in 1948 on the charge of conspiracy in Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination but was acquitted for lack of evidence. The BJP has in its manifesto for the Maharashtra Assembly elections promised to honour Savarkar with the Bharat Ratna, the country’s highest civilian award.

One of the Sangh parivar’s pet peeves is that most universities in the country teach a “Leftist” version of Indian history that, among other things, glorifies Mughal rule.

It wants Indian history rewritten to project the whole of Islamic rule as retrogressive, lionise Hindu kings like Prithviraj Chauhan and Rana Pratap who fought Muslim invaders or rulers, and extol ancient Indian (Hindu) knowledge and wisdom.

Shah claimed that India was regaining its “lost glory” under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He asserted that after the Mahabharat period, the Gupta period (fourth to sixth century AD) was the golden age of Indian history.

“The country is regaining its lost glory under Modiji. The entire world now accepts India and accords importance to its philosophy,” he said.

“Now that India is independent, historians must rethink and rewrite its history. Whatever you write must be true and popular (among the readers). How long should we keep cursing Leftist, English and Mughal historians (for alleged distortion)?”

The Telegraph – Rift over bid to make Modi saint

Rashtra Rishi project by Kashi Parishad runs into wall

Piyush Srivastava

Lucknow – UP – India 04 June 2019. An attempt by some members of a premier body of Hindu scholars to confer sainthood on Prime Minister Narendra Modi has run into trouble, with other members calling the effort illegitimate and politically motivated.

Some members of the Kashi Vidwat Parishad, an organisation based in Modi’s constituency of Varanasi, had last week announced the Prime Minister would be honoured with the title of “Rashtra Rishi” (National Sage or National Saint).

But several other members, including Parishad general secretary Shivaji Upadhyaya, told reporters on Monday the so-called decision was not taken at the correct forum or with the requisite quorum.

“It’s the handiwork of a few sycophants of the ruling dispensation. They decided to bestow this title on the Prime Minister without consulting the politically neutral members and without quorum,” Upadhyaya said.

“Any such decision has to be passed at a general body meeting with the consent of three-fourths of the 24 members. No such meeting was convened. Just two people sat together and announced to the media a ceremony would be held in Varanasi to confer the title on the Prime Minister.”

Rishi Dwivedi, a Parishad member, told The Telegraph: “I fully agree with Upadhyaya. Even I was not informed about any meeting or decision.”

He argued that the title “Rashtra Rishi” was a “wrong and impure” coinage that lacked scriptural sanction. “The pure word is ‘Rajarshi’,” Dwivedi said.

There are four traditional titles for the accomplished among the rishis (sages): Rajarshi (Royal Sage, meant for rulers who turn outstanding sages), Maharshi (Great Sage), Brahmarshi (Eternal Sage) and Devarshi (Divine Sage).

“Rashtra Rishi” appears to be a coinage by Baba Ramdev, who had honoured Modi with the tag two years ago when the Prime Minister inaugurated a research institute at the yoga televangelist’s Patanjali Yogpeeth in Haridwar.

The conferment of such a title by the Parishad, which Allahabad High Court has consulted over disputes relating to the Hindu religion, might be deemed to carry more weight, although such canonisation by it has in the past been tainted by political controversy.

The Parishad had honoured then Prime Minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh with the title “Brahmarshi” in January 1990, only to withdraw it in August that year when he accepted the Mandal Commission recommendations on OBC reservations, opening itself to charges of advocating “Manuvad”.

A Parishad member told this newspaper on the condition of anonymity that certain central BJP leaders and ministers from the Yogi Adityanath government had contacted two of the organisation’s members before the general election to lobby for a title for Modi.

“These two members are known BJP stooges. They take favours from the government and do nothing except praise Modi and Adityanath,” he said.

“Over 90 per cent of Parishad members opposed the idea of granting the title to Modi, which is why it couldn’t be done before the election. But the stooges got cracking again after the results.

“These two members have lowered the prestige of the Parishad, which is the highest body for discourses on Hinduism. These sycophants have entered the Parishad with the help of the BJP and the RSS.”

Parishad secretary Ram Narayan Dwivedi told reporters that all norms had been followed while taking the “decision” to honour Modi with the title.

“It was decided at an emergency meeting on May 28. Most of the members agreed that like the saints of old, Modi too cared for every living being. His government’s schemes are meant for all,” he said.

A state BJP spokesperson in Lucknow, asking not to be identified, said no party leader had pressured the Parishad to grant the title to Modi.