The fake news industry has grown by leaps and bounds under the tutelage of the BJP.
Krishnan Srinivasan
Kolkata – West Bengal – India, 05 april 2024. This book is a trenchant critique of the BJP’s current period in office by Sanjay Jha, a former Congress spokesman.
He regrets that “people have acquiesced with repressive regimes by popular choice” and cites the Pegasus spying scandal and the use of the CBI and ED as “barefaced authoritarianism of a repressive regime. India’s criminal justice system needs a herculean makeover.”
Out of 129 cases in 2019–23, 95 per cent were against opposition persons. And UAPA has been “wantonly abused”.
Jha writes, “To reconstruct or recalibrate a nation, continuity in office is a prerequisite. But rare is the strongman leader who grows less autocratic the longer he stays in office.”
Modi and the BJP are helped by a fawning media, a fractured opposition and a tolerant middle class, and the “Electoral bonds is a daylight heist” as was the PM-Cares fund when Modi rebuffed calls for transparency.
Jha says Modi has successfully normalised intimidation, lynching, hate speeches, cronyism, fake news, and communal stress, and interestingly points out that the BJP in 2004 opposed UP Chief Minister Mulayam Yadav’s move to replace India with “Bharat”.
“Politicians are an extremely insecure bunch,” writes Jha, “but for some it borders on paranoia.”
BJP dislikes being interrogated with tough questions. The common habit of authoritarian demagogues is to appear always in command, infallible, an example of perfection, but at moments of crisis they are missing in action.
In the largest democracy, Prime Minister Modi has never held a press conference.
The health of a democracy is determined by the integrity and independence of its institutions.
Capital-intensive projects on a public-private model “have an intrinsic nepotism built into them”, but SEBI’s “stupefying silence on Adani’s irrational, exponential wealth gain was inexplicable”, considering that his wealth rose from $4.5 billion in 2014 to $150 billion in 2022.
Jha concludes that “Adani and Modi go together. Their sharp vertical progression simultaneously was not a celestial coincidence.”
Jha enumerates the BJP’s failings as he views them: religious loathing, demonetisation, GST, farmer distress, Covid lockdown, internet shutdowns, targeting of journalists, arrests of comedians, harassment of the opposition, religious persecution, unemployment, crony capitalism, majoritarian politics, and challenges to the Places of Worship Act 1991.
Religious fundamentalists could challenge constitutional propriety with “insouciant ease” with the illegal use of bulldozers against dissidents and campaigns against hijab, halal, beef, azan, love jihad, ghar wapsi, lynching and meat eating.
During Covid, Trump, Bolsonaro and Johnson suffered political setbacks, but “for Modi it was a gold medal” despite WHO recording 4.7 million deaths, about nine times the official Indian figure.
“Modi may be remembered as the premier in whose tenure the Ram temple was built, but for Ram Rajya, India will have to wait for another prime minister.
There is little to cheer for one that had ten long uninterrupted years and a full majority in Parliament. In any other democratic country the BJP government would have been on its last legs.”
The fake news industry has grown by leaps and bounds under the tutelage of the BJP. Both The Kerala Story and The Kashmir Files propagated lies.
The minority Muslims are vilified though a soft target, and non-vegetarian food has become offensive to the majority. Majoritarian populism abounds in South Asia—Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan and Sri Lanka.
Jha tellingly points out that Sikhs were targeted after Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984, and Muslims brutally attacked in Modi’s Gujarat, yet both Rajiv Gandhi and Modi won elections, so “India has an ersatz democracy corrupted at the core.”
The BJP wishes to destroy opposition parties, accusing them of dynastic domination, corruption and incompetence, as being anti-national, anti-Hindu, pro-Pakistan and anti-development.
It was important that the Congress-led opposition treat the BJP’s defeat not as an election objective but as a national responsibility.
Modern India is, at its core, a Congress construct. To Congress are due RTI, RTE, MGNREGA, Land Acquisition, National Health Mission, Aadhar, Direct Benefits Transfer, Lok Pal, Food Security Act, the revised farm bills, GST and Jan Dhan.
But the Congress in opposition is “plagued by internal hubris [and] incremental fiddling” and leaves the author distressed. Congress is consumed by fear and dodges the Hinduism versus Hindutva debate. Its second malaise is its leadership.
Here, Jha badly errs in visualising Nitish Kumar of Bihar as a prospective leader for the opposition, writing, “He would end up giving the struggling opposition a potent political weapon.” This prediction is now overtaken by Kumar’s defection to the BJP.
This is an accusatory book, with Modi and the BJP as its targets, written in a florid and often convoluted prose style with an arcane vocabulary that would give Shashi Tharoor a run for his money.
Words like fustian, monopsonist, foofaraw, puffery, sparling, orthogonal, dorky, taradiddle, occultist, foxy, dedolomitization, lambent and arcadian impel the reader to have a dictionary to hand. Whether this helps the author’s argument or not is best left for the reader to answer.
The reviewer is a former foreign secretary.
The Statesman – Kolkata
04 April 2024
Scroll.in – Why BJP leaders’ comments on study about Muslim population in India are misleading
A study by Modi’s Economic Advisory Council has mentioned data on rise in share of Muslim population. This was already known from the decadal Census.
Abhik Deb
New Delhi – India, 09/05/2024. On Thursday, several news outlets reported on a study released by the prime minister’s Economic Advisory Council on the changes in the share of population of religious minorities in 167 countries between 1950 and 2015.
The headline for most publications was that the share of Muslim population in India had risen from from 9.84% in 1950 to 14.09% in 2015 – which is so say, 43.15%. On the other hand, the share of India’s Hindu population declined from 84.68% to 78.06% during that period – that is, 7.82%, the study said.
The first claim made by Chandrasekhar is misleading while the second one is outright false. The findings of the study about the change in religion-wise population share are not new and follow a trend that has been well-documented in the decadal Census.
Census data shows that the religious composition of the country’s population has undergone only modest changes since 1951. In fact, the decadal growth rate for Muslims has been declining over the past three decades.
As far back as 2015, Shoaib Daniyal had written about the flaws in the arguments of the leaders of the Hindutva party. In an article headlined, “Five charts that puncture the bogey of Muslim population growth”, he demonstrated how the rhetoric on demographics is belied by data.
On Thursday, several news outlets reported on a study released by the prime minister’s Economic Advisory Council on the changes in the share of population of religious minorities in 167 countries between 1950 and 2015.
Union minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar claimed that the “demography of India is being altered” due to increase in population of a “particular community”.
He also linked the study to the Bharatiya Janata Party’s claim that the Congress wanted to introduce reservations in education and government jobs on the basis of religion.
The second claim that the Congress intends to provide quotas on the basis of religion has been debunked by several organisations, including Scroll. The Congress manifesto makes no such promise.
BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi made similar claims, while the party’s social media cell chief Amit Malviya claimed that the rise in share of population of Muslims was due to “decades of Congress rule”.
The fact that BJP leaders are using a well-known fact about India’s demographics to make misleading claims in the middle of the general elections raises questions on the timing of the release of the study.
Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav asked how the study could have determined the country’s population according to religion when the national Census, scheduled to be conducted in 2021, had not yet been started.
India’s religious composition largely unchanged
https://scroll.in/article/1067687/why-bjp-leaders-comments-on-study-about-muslim-population-in-india-are-misleading
Tags: A study by Modi’s Economic Advisory Council has mentioned data on rise in share of Muslim population, Abhik Deb, BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi, BJP's social media cell chief Amit Malviya, India’s religious composition largely unchanged, New Delhi - India, Scroll.in, Union minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar claimed that the “demography of India is being altered, Why BJP leaders’ comments on study about Muslim population in India are misleading